The Messiah is found in the scriptures and inter-Testament & Rabbinical writings.
In Jewish as well as Christian eschatology the Messiah is either declared or hinted at throughout the OT scriptures. Many messianic verses are held in common by both Christian and Jew. A frequent charge against Christians is that their messianic expectations have been drawn from the surrounding pagan culture and not from 1 st century Jewish culture or Hebrew scriptures. Looking into early Jewish writings and the Dead Sea scrolls reveals a picture of Jewish messianic thought that agrees very well with the NT expectations.
Before I show a the messianic scriptures there are several arguments that revive and re-circulate in liberal academic circles which need to be addressed concerning Jesus of Nazareth.
Pagan savior-myth argument
As I mentioned a common attack leveled at Christians is the pagan savior-myth similarity between Jesus the Messiah and pagan messiah/saviors. Liberal Protestants, Jewish and Muslim scholars describe the New Testament Jesus as the product of Pagan, Mystery religions but many rely on out-dated books like "Paulus" (1904) by Wede and Bruckner's Der Strebe und Auferstehende Gottheiland (1908), Bousset's "Kyrious Christos" (1913) and Bultman's, "Theology of the New Testament" (1951). The view of the NT originating from pagan theology is called the Werde-Bousset thesis. This view was thoroughly debunked long ago but is still taught and presented erroneously as solid scholarship. Several books that refute the Werde-Bousset thesis are "The origin of Paul's religion" (1925) by Dr. Gresham, "Paul and Jesus" (1958) by Ridderbos, "The origin of Paul's religion" (1981) by Seyoon Kim.
Many anti-Christian sites on the Internet present this view. What they don't explain is the reliability of the information. There is a great problem finding ancient "primary" sources because there is little or no early dated documents to tell us what these people believe before Christian influence. Most if not all pagan/mystery information is post Christian and therefore subject to the influences of Christian beliefs. Actually, most is written by Christians using "Christian terminology" to describe pagan beliefs. If your only extant document describing an ancient religion is 3 rd century AD or more and third party at that, how can that be scientific evidence? After a long time of contact how do you know who influenced whom? Speculation is not fact. The similarities between Isis, Horus, Dionysus, Mithras, Krishna or Buddha may be due to cultural interaction. Many of the so-called listed similarities are somewhat forced and when fully examined, reveal very different circumstances. For example in comparing "Virgin births", the Orphic story of Dionysus, has Zeus in the form of a serpent, impregnating Persephone. Also the preexistent Buddha enters the womb of his mother who was married and not a virgin. New Testament practices may be quite different than post "Edit of Toleration", 31 AD Church practices (i.e. Christmas & Easter celebrations) and should not be judge as the same.
"It must be remembered that SOME general similarities MUST apply to any religious leader. They must generally be good leaders, do noteworthy feats of goodness and/or supernatural power, establish teachings and traditions, create community rituals, and overcome some forms of evil. These are common elements of the religious life--NOT objects that require some theory of dependence. - article: Glen Miller "was Jesus Christ just a CopyCat Savior Myth?"
"All the deities that have been identified as belonging to the class of dying and rising deities can be subsumed under the two larger classes of disappearing deities or dying deities. In the first case, the deities return but have not died; in the second case, the gods die but do not return. There is no unambiguous instance in the history of religions of a dying and rising deity." The Encyclopedia of Religion [Macmillian: 1987; Jonathan Z. Smith, Professor at University of Chicago.
Pagan religions are notoriously syncretistic in that they freely change and incorporate other beliefs and practices. However, Judaism and Christianity quickly adopted rigid beliefs and doctrines. Christianity excels the most in this area as well as a fixed ecclesiastical structure. Even though orthodox churches are criticized for these very facts, all this is done to maintain continuity of faith from one generation to another.
Unlike pagan mythologies the God presented in the Bible is connected to time and space. Perhaps this is the great strength that was recognized and later copied by pagan/Christ syncretistic religions. This is also the point of attack for some modern critics.
Alfred Edersheim in chapter five of his book "The life and times of Jesus the Messiah", shows how the Synagogue taught the doctrine of the divinity of the Messiah long before the Christians came along. He uses rabbinical literature, the Talmud as well as the book of Enoch and other non-canonical literature to show the presence of these ideas in pre and post Christian Jewish culture. It is possible that the Egyptians and Greeks borrowed some of these ideas adapting them in to their own theologies. The point being that the divinity of the Messiah came from Jewish sources not as some try to argue the pagans.
Historical Jesus
The denial of a historical Jesus began in the early 1800s but is now the center of renewed discussion. Although it is true that there is little historical documentation about Jesus, it is understandable, considering the ravages of the Roman war on Jerusalem and Judea during the "great revolt" (70 AD) and during the Bar Kochba rebellion (134 AD). I might also mention the Jewish-Greek civil war at Alexander, Egypt in 116 AD in which the Romans killed or enslaved the entire Jewish population (With a population of some 150,000 Jews, Alexandria was Judaism's largest city). The whole Egyptian-Palestine area was in constant turmoil. To say the lack of historical documentation can only mean a non-historical Jesus ignores the social and political realities, brought about through the destruction of much of, what was later called, "Palestine". The magnitude of destruction can be gauged from the comments of Josephus, who estimated that a million Jews died in the 70 AD struggle against Rome. That's pretty destructive even by modern standards. Rome frequently persecuted both Jews and Christian with great cruelty and were not concerned with saving Jewish or Christian literature but rather confiscated and destroyed as much as possible. Furthermore, the writing medium of this time was papyrus, which deteriorated easily, unlike expensive animal skin or like parchment that came later. This is not a cop-out; it's a hard fact that critics conveniently ignore. Furthermore it is believed that the Gospel, like most ancient traditions, was chiefly at the beginning oral in transmission. Although there were written orthodox accounts besides the accepted gospels (Luke 1:1), they are now lost or yet to be uncovered. Papas, one of the early Church fathers, refers to a list of saying by Jesus, which have been lost. Lists like the Didache may have been more common than an actual gospel narrative.
If you discount the witness of the first century New Testament writers and the many writings of the early Church Fathers (i.e., Polycarp, Esuebeus, Irenaeus, Justin, Origen, etc) there is significant evidence from the comments of Josephus, Roman critics, and notations found in the Jewish Mishnah and Talmud. No single source by itself could confirm the historicity of Jesus without debate, but taken as a body of information I believe most people and scholars would concede that Jesus was a real person. Concerning the Gospels as a reliable witness, I think it is unjustified to dismiss out of hand witnesses closest in time to Jesus whose records have not only been numerous and well preserved but supported sufficiently by history and archeology (of course a driver's license and a DNA sample would help - humor!). Unless proved otherwise these ancient reporters should be taken at their word. Very few people doubt that there was a "Buddha", or Mohammed, of course, with Jesus the stakes are much higher. Buddha, a man, became like a god, Mohammed claimed to be the final prophet with the true message from God. Jesus claimed to be God, sent from God to become a man in order to reconcile mankind back to God. Because of the consequences of the claims made by Christ (i.e., the destiny of mankind), He is the focus of intense longstanding examination.
Non-Christian sources
"Now, there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works-a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews, and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ; (64) and when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him, for he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him; and the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct at this day."
For the latest information on this controversial text clickhere
The younger Ananus, who had been appointed to the high priesthood, was rash in his temper and unusually daring. He followed the school of the Sadducees, who are indeed more heartless than any of the other Jews, as I have already explained, when they sit in judgment. Possessed of such a character, Ananus thought that he had a favorable opportunity because Festus was dead and Albinas was still on the way. And so he convened the judges of the Sanhedrin, and brought before them the brother of Jesus, the one called Christ, whose name was James, and certain others, and accusing them of having transgressed the law delivered them up to be stoned. Those of the inhabits of the city who were considered the most fair-minded and who were strict in observance of the law were offended at this. They therefore secretly sent to King Agrippa urging him, for Ananus had not even been correct in his first step, to order him to desist from any further such actions. Certain of them even went to meet Albinus, who was on his way from Alexandria, and informed him that Ananus had no authority to convene the Sanhedrin without his consent. Convinced by these words, Albinus angrily wrote to Ananus threatening to take vengeance upon him. King Agrippa, because of Ananus' action, deposed him from the high priesthood which he had held for three months and replaced him with Jesus the son of Damnaeus. (Louis Feldman translation)
Celsus lived in during the 2nd century, AD. In a 3rd century Origen refutes the anti-Christian claims of Celsus. Celsus' writings do not survive in tact, but Origen quotes some of his work. Obviously, Celsus believes that Jesus had once existed but gives a different story of his origin. One example is found below. Origen, Contra Celsum 1.28 Translation, quoted from Mead
"Jesus had come from a village in Judea, and was the son of a poor Jewess who gained her living by the work of her own hands. His mother had been turned out of doors by her husband, who was a carpenter, by trade, on being convicted of adultery [with a soldier named Panthéra (i.32)]. Being thus driven away by her husband, and wandering about in disgrace, she gave birth to Jesus, a bastard. Jesus, on account of his poverty, was hired out to go to Egypt. While there he acquired certain (magical) powers which Egyptians pride themselves on possessing. He returned home highly elated at possessing these powers, and on the strength of them gave himself out to be a god. "
...neither human resources, nor imperial generosity, nor appeasement of the gods, eliminated the sinister suspicion that the fire had been deliberately started. To stop the rumor, NERO, made scapegoats--and punished with every refinement the notoriously depraved CHRISTIANS (as they were popularly called). Their originator, CHRIST, had been executed in Tiberius' reign by the Procurator of Judaea, PONTIUS PILATUS (governor from 26 to 36 A.D.). But in spite of this temporary setback, the deadly superstition had broken out again, not just in Judaea (where the mischief had started) but even in Rome. All degraded and shameful practices collect and flourish in the capital. First, NERO had the self-admitted Christians arrested. Then, on their information, large numbers of others were condemned--not so much for starting fires as because of their hatred for the human race. Their deaths were made amusing. Dressed in wild animals' skins, they were torn to pieces by dogs, or crucified, or made into torches to be seton fire after dark as illumination.... Despite their guilt as Christians, and the ruthless punishment it deserved, the victims were pitied. For it was felt that they were being sacrificed to one man's brutality rather than to the national interest."
"Since the Jews were constantly causing disturbances at the instigation of CHRESTUS, he expelled them from the city..."
Osiris the Sun-deity of Egypt, was called Chrestos , (Christianity and Mythology, p. 331, J.M. Robertson). Also "the word Christos ... was confused with the common Greek proper name Chrestos, meaning 'good'." In the third century A.D, in the Synagogue of the Marcionites on Mount Hermon, the Messiah's title is spelled Chrestos. According to Tertullian and Lactantius, the common people usually called Christ Chrestos. Tertullian and Lactantius inform us that "the common people usually called Christ Chrestos". Clement of Alexandria, in the same age, said, "all who believe in Christ are called Chrestoi, that is 'good men.'
"[After the Great Fire]...punishments were also inflicted on the CHRISTIANS, a sect professing a new and mischievous religious belief....
"...I have never been present at an examination of Christians. So, I do not know the nature or the extent of the punishments usually dealt out to them, nor the grounds for starting an investigation and how far it should be carried...For the moment this is the line I have taken with all persons brought before me on the charge of being Christians. I have asked them in person if they are Christians; if they admit it, I repeat the question a second and athird time, with a warning of the punishment awaiting them. If they persist, I order them to be led away for punishment; for whatever the nature of their admission, I am convinced that their stubbornness (contumacia) and unshakeable obstinacy ought to be punished. There have been others similarly fanatical who are Roman citizens; I have entered them on the list of persons to be sent to Rome for punishment.... I considered that I should dismiss any who denied that they were or ever had been Christians, once they had repeated after me a formula of invocation to the gods and had made offerings of wine and incense to your statue (which I had ordered to be brought into court for this purpose along with images of the gods), and furthermore had ursed the name of Christ. Real Christians (I understand) can never be induced to do these things....They declared that the sum total of their guilt or error amounted to no more than this: they had met regularly before dawn on a fixed day to chant verses alternately among themselves in honor of Christ as if to a god, and also to bind themselves by oath, not for any criminal purpose, but to abstain from theft, robbery and adultery, to commit no breach of trust and not to refuse to return a deposit upon demand. After this ceremony it had been their custom to disperse and later to take food of an ordinary harmless kind. But they had in fact given this up since my edict, issued on your instructions, which banned all political societies. This made me decide it was all the more necessary to extract the truth from two slave women (whom they call `deaconesses' by torture. I found nothing but a degenerate sort of cult carried to extravagant lengths... I have therefore postponed any further examination and hastened to consult you..."
THE EMPEROR TRAJAN TO PLINY:
"You have followed the right course of procedure, my dear Pliny, in your examination of the cases of persons charged with being Christians. For it is impossible to lay down a general rule to a fixed formula. These people must not be hunted out. But if they are brought before you and the charge against them is proved true, they must be punished. But in the case of anyone who denies that he is a Christian, and makes it clear that he is not, by offering prayers to our gods, he is to be pardoned as a result of his repentance--however suspect his conduct may have been in the past. But pamphlets circulated anonymously must play NO part in any accusation. They create the worst precedent, and are quite out of keeping with the spirit of our age."
Hey some people also debunk the above quotes as Christian interpolations but they have an anti-Christian agenda rather than a serious debate. I guess they see Christian redactors behind every pagan work. Their arguments reflect more conjecture rather than real substance, and their purposes seems to be that of casting doubt and ridicule.Lucian, Perigrinus, 11ff.
It was then that he [Perigrinus] learned the wondrous lore of the Christians, by associating with their priests and scribes in Palestine. And--how else could it be? He made them all look like children; for he was prophet, cult-leader, head of the synagogue, and everything, all by himself. He interpreted and explained some of their books and even composed many, and they revered him as a god, made use of him as a lawgiver, and set him down as a protector, next after that other, to be sure, whom they still worship, the man who was crucified in Palestine because he introduced this new cult into the world. ... The poor wretches have convinced themselves first and foremost, that they are going to be immortal and live for all time, in consequence of which they despise death and even willingly give themselves into custody, most of them. Furthermore, their first lawgiver persuaded them that they are all brothers of one another, after they have transgressed once for all by denying the Greek gods, and by worshipping that crucified sophist him-self and living under his laws. Therefore they despise all things indiscriminately and consider them common property--receiving such doctrines traditionally without any definite evidence. So if any charlatan or tricksters able to profit from them, comes along and gets among them he quickly acquires sudden wealth by imposing upon simple folk.
In the Talmud we can find uncomplimentary references to Jesus, Mary and his disciples, which should not be, surprising considering the NT gives similar views of the Jewish ruling council. For many centuries the Talmud and other Hebrew writings were condemned, censored and even confiscated and publicly burned because of the presumed or otherwise known insults to Jesus written therein. From the mid -13th century the Jewish community has suffered greatly from this tragic hostility and persecution.
It may be of interest to note that some 17
th
century Jewish rabbis took steps to expunge all references to Jesus due to
Christian persecution of the Jews.
"Thus in 1631 the Jewish Assembly of Elders in Poland declared: ‘We enjoin
you under the threat of the great ban to publish in no new edition of the
Mishnah
or the Gemara
anything that refers to Jesus of Nazareth
... If you will not diligently heed this letter, but run counter thereto and
continue to publish our books in the same manner as heretofore, you might bring
over us and yourselves still greater sufferings than in previous times."
- Morris Goldstein, pg.4
Jesus in the Jewish tradition
Fortunately, uncensored pre-1631 texts can be found in Oxford University and
several other European libraries. The "Jesus statements" are published
separately in numerous editions and studied by Jewish scholars in private.
Although the Soncino edition of the Babylonian Talmud is a censored text, the
editors usually give the uncensored original readings in a footnote.
Because of the Christian censors, Jesus is often referred to a "so and so", "that man", "Ben Strada", "Yeshu". Goldstein (
Jesus in the Jewish tradition
) thinks that Ben Strata refers to Simon Magnus instead of a Jesus, contrary to other authorities. A few examples of Talmudic reverences are noted below.
It happened with R. Elazar ben Damah, whom a serpent bit, that Jacob, a man of Kefar Soma, came to heal him in the name of Yeshua ben Pantera ; but R. Ishmael did not let him. He said, "You are not permitted, Ben Damah." He answered, " I will bring you proof that he may heal me ." But he had no opportunity to bring proof, for he died. (Whereupon) R. Ishmael said, "Happy art thou, Ben Damah, for you have gone in peace and you have not broken down the fence of the Sages; since everyone who breaks down the fence of the Sages, to him punishment will ultimately come, as it is in Scripture: 'Whoso breaketh through a fence, a serpent shall bite him.'" (Tosefta Hullin 2.22; Jerusalem Talmud , Shabbath 14d and Abodah Zarah 40d, 41a; B abylonian Talmud , Abodah Zarah 27b)
(Shabbath 104b): There is a tradition: Rabbi Eleazor said to the sages, Has not the son of Stada brought magic spells from Egypt in an incision on his skin? They answered him, He was a fool, and we do not accept proofs from a fool.
Tosephta, Shabbath XI, 15: 'He that cuts marks upon his flesh'--Rabbi Eleazor condemns, the sages permit. He said to them, And did not Ben Stada learn only in this way? They said to him, Because of one fool are we to destroy all reasonable men?
In parallel, the accusation of sorcery can be found in the apocryphal "Acts of Pilate" also known as the "Gospel of Nicodemus".
Our Rabbis taught: Yeshu had five disciples -Mattai, Nakkai, Netzer, Buni, and Todah. (Sanhedrin 43a)The purpose for singling out only five of Jesus' disciples could be due to the fact that other rabbis in the Talmud such as Yohanan ben Zakkai and Akiba are also said to have five disciples. (McDowell & Wilson, p. 65)
"And it is tradition: On the eve of Passover they hung Jeshu [the Nazarene]. And the crier went forth before him forty days (saying), [Jeshu the Nazarene] goeth forth to be stoned, because he hath practiced magic and deceived and led Israel astray. Anyone, who knoweth aught in his favor, let him come and declare concerning him. And they found naught in his favor. And they hung him on the eve of the Passover. Ulla said, 'Would it be supposed that [Jeshu the Nazarene] a revolutionary had aught in his favor?' He was a deceiver and the Merciful (i.e. God) hath said (Deut. xiii 8), `Thou shalt not spare, neither shalt thou conceal him.' But it was different with [Jeshu the Nazarene] for he was near the kingdom. ''' (Sanhedrin 43a)
"Rabbi Eliezer ha-Kappar said: God gave strength to his (Balaam's) voice so
that it went from one end of the world to the other, because he looked forth
and beheld the nations that bow down to the sun and moon and stars, and to wood
and stone, and he looked forth and saw
that there was a man, born of a woman, who should rise up and seek to make
himself God, and to cause the whole world to go astray.
Therefore God gave power to the voice of Balaam that all the peoples of the
world might hear, and thus he spake: Give heed that ye go not astray
after that man
, for is written, 'God is not a man that he should lie.'
And if he says that he is God, he is a liar; and he will deceive and say that
he departed and cometh again at the end
. He saith and he shall not perform. See what is written: And he took up his
parable and said, 'Alas, when God doeth this.' Balaam said, Alas, who shall
live- of what nation
which heareth that man who hath made himself God
." (Yalkut Shimeon, [S alonica] sec. 725 on
wayissa mishalo
[Num. 23. 7], according to
Midrash Y'lamm'denue)
From the above we can see that the contributors to the Talmud at least
saw Jesus as a real man. Now lets move to the scriptural evidence.
Below is some NT scripture that tells of the Messiah Jesus in the OT. (I know this is circular proof but for now just follow along so I can make my case.) Following this, I will give a short list of messianic prophecies that point to Yeshua as Messiah. "the scriptures" - the Torah, prophets and writings. In John 5:36-39, Yeshua said: "I have testimony weightier than that of John. For the very work that the Father has given me to finish, and which I am doing, testifies that the Father has sent me. And the Father who has sent me has himself testified concerning me. You have never heard his voice nor seen his form, nor does his word dwell in you, for you do not believe the one he sent. You diligently study the Scriptures because you think that by them you possess eternal life. These are the Scriptures that testify about me , yet you refuse to come to me to have life."
Genesis 3:15: "And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and the her seed...". This is the first hint of the Messiah. Hebraically speaking, women do not have seeds - this points to a very unusual situation in Isaiah 7:14
Jewish scriptural interpretations called the Targums may give interpretive insight on how the Synagogue durring the
time of the second temple understood scripture.
Targum
(tär´gm) [Aramaic,=translation], Aramaic paraphrase of the Hebrew Bible.
When Aramaic replaced the Hebrew tongue among the Jews of Palestine and
Babylon, interpreters were called to translate and explain the scriptural
passages that were read aloud during synagogue services. The oral Aramaic
paraphrases were, in the course of time, put down in writing under the name
Targum. One of the best-known Targums extant is the Targum Onkelos (see
Onkelos). The Targum is printed in the margin of corresponding parts of the
Bible. A complete manuscript of a Palestinian Targum, the first of its kind,
was found in 1956.
-
The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition. Copyright © 2000 Columbia
University Press.
Zechariah: 14:3 "...the LORD will go forth and fight against those nations..."
Zechariah 14:4 "...His feet will stand on the Mount of Olives..."
Zechariah 14:5 "... Thus the LORD my God will come and all the saints with you."
Zechariah 14:9 And the LORD shall be King over all the earth..."
The LORD i.e., Yeshua (Acts 1:11-12) will stand on the Mt. of Olives, deliver Israel from their enemies, then reign forever as King over all the earth.
Circumcision of the heart and the New Covenant
In Deuteronomy 10:12-16 the LORD explains what is required of Israel: "Fear the
LORD, walk In His ways, and love Him with all there heart and soul". They must
keep His commandments and statutes. To do these things He says In vs.
16:"Therefore circumcise the foreskin of your heart, and be stiff-necked no
more." Unfortunately they were not willing or able to do this.
Foreseeing that Israel would forsake Him, the LORD pronounces curses and
blessing Deuteronomy. 27,28. They would be scattered among the nation -
Deuteronomy 28:64-65. Even though Israel saw all the miracles and judgements
against Egypt, they would turn away to other gods. Considering all these
things, Moses says (Deut.29: 4), "Yet the LORD has not given you a heart to
perceive and eyes to see and ears to hear, to this very day."
In Deuteronomy 30:6, Moses points to the day when a wayward Israel would return
to the LORD and obey Him. God would then bring them back from among the nations
and He would change their hearts! "And the LORD your God will circumcise your
hearts and the heart of your descendants."
The LORD further reveals through Jeremiah how God will change their hearts.
(31:31-34). Looking to the future beyond the Babylonian captivity he reveals
that "The LORD will establish a New Covenant with Israel and the house of
Judah". It will not be as the former Sinai covenant, which they broke. This
time The LORD will put His Torah (LAW) In their minds and write it on their
hearts, instead of stone tablets. Everyone therefore will know the LORD and He
will forgive all their Iniquity and sin.
Ezekiel 11:19 adds: " Then I will give them one heart, and I will put a new
spirit within them, and take the stoney heart out of their flesh, and give them
a heart of flesh, that they may walk In My statutes and keep My judgments and
do them;"
The spirit that the LORD will put In them is the Holy Spirit (Ezek. 36:27)
which will empower them to walk In His statutes and judgments.
Moses himself prophesied the giving of God's Spirit when God's Spirit rested
upon the seventy elders (Numbers 11:25-29). Eldad and Medad remained in the
camp but received the Spirit and prophesied. When informed by Joshua, Moses
replied: "Oh, that all the LORD's people were prophets and that the LORD would
put His Spirit upon them!"
Looking to the future, the prophet Joel (2:28-29) says: "And it shall come to
pass afterward that I will pour out My Spirit on all flesh; your sons and
daughters shall prophesy, your old men shall dream dreams your young men shall
see visions and on My menservants and on My maidservants I will pour out My
Spirit In those days."
That outpouring would come four hundred and eighty three years after the
command to rebuild the walls of Jerusalem, as prophesied in the book of Daniel.
Recorded In the book of Acts chapter two is the fulfillment of this prophecy.
"And suddenly there came a sound from heaven, as a rushing mighty winds, and it
filled the whole house where they were sitting. There appeared to them divided
tongues as of fire, and one set upon each of them. And they were all filled
with the Holy Spirit and began to speak with other tongues (real languages of
men), as the Spirit gave them utterance."
This was a sign of the New Covenant being inaugurated, first to the Jews and
then the gentiles. The LORD is the God of salvation and the Messiah Yeshua is
the agent of that salvation. Now consider the words of Yeshua as He spoke to
Nicodemus a member of Jewish ruling council.
John 3:3 "I tell you the truth, unless a man is born again, he cannot see the
kingdom of heaven."
If you, like Nicodemus, do not know what it is to be born again, but desire to
follow God and have Him forgive all your sins, (past, present, and future) then
you must follow the simple message of the gospel. And that is:
If you have any questions or have any suggestions, please contact me at my E-mail address.
Return to the main page
Jesus (Yeshua in the Torah)
Links