Is Keeping the Sabbath Christian? - A wakeup call

A short scriptural and historical survey, by Donald F. Shomody

The traditional Christian view that Sunday, the Christian Worship day and/or Sabbath, is sanctioned unquestionably by the resurrection, is based upon an extraordinarily huge lie told over and over again. In the following article we will examine this lie and compare it to scripture and the practice of the early and post apostolic Church (i.e. before 70 & after 100 AD).

I must add, that I hate using the word lie, because there are so many devout Christian men and woman who have dedicated their lives to the cause of Christ who ignore the seventh day and worship on Sunday, viewing this as a sacred duty. Nevertheless sincerity is not the measure of truth and I can not shrink from the facts and I hope you will not either.

Before we begin lets consider the following two verses which caution against adding or taking away from scripture.

* Deuteronomy 4:2 - Ye shall not add unto the word, which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.
* Mark 7:9 "Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition. " - Jesus
Jesus states the permanency of the OT scriptures.
* Mathew 5:18 –19 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.

Contrary to these words spoken by Jesus, Thomas Aquinas (A. D. 1225-1274) who is regarded as the greatest Catholic theologian states explicitly:

"The observance of the Lord's Day took the place of the observance of the Sabbath not by virtue of the [Biblical] precept but by the institution of the church."

Can we conclude that Jesus was wrong about the Word changing? The jot and tittle of the fourth commandment has been broken by Church decree. Our common sense tells us that the words of Jesus have greater weight than that of his bride. So from the very beginning of the post Apostolic Church, God’s eternal Word was compromised with additions and subtractions by those who were the very benefactors of God’s grace and supposed guardians of the faith.

Below are two scriptures that are historically used to conclude the abolishment of the Sabbath and Biblical feasts.

Galatians 4:10 - Ye observe days, and months, and times, and years .
Colossians 2:16 But Paul says - " Let no man therefore judge you in food, or in drink, or in respect of a feast day , or of the new moon, or of the sabbaths ": "Sabbaths" or Sabbaton (plural) can also mean a week (7 days). Words in Italics do not appear in the Greek text.

There are problems with the conclusions drawn from the traditional interpretations of these two verses when compared to other relevant scriptures and Greek language usage. New scholarship sees the traditional anti-Law, anti-Jewish interpretation of the epistles of Paul as misinterpreted. It is unthinkable that part of the New Testament would conflict with the words of Jesus or the OT scriptures and yet we are asked by past and present Bible authorities to overlook inconsistent Church doctrine. As you read along you will see that the Church has been misguided by its shepherds (at least in the area of our discussion). It has been through social and theological prejudice that their understanding has been impaired.

Here are some more questions before we start:

  1. Can we find any NT scripture commanding us to reject the Sabbath or is it based solely on human reasoning & tradition?
  2. Is there evidence that pre & post Apostolic Christians observe both the Sabbath rest and Sunday worship? Most "Sunday only" polemists avoid this question. Their poor arguments certer on wishful conjectures of what the Apostles must have done instead of fact of what was done after their deaths by an Apostatizing Church. The Church certainly has chosen many wrong paths. Remember the "Reformation" didn't happen in a vaccum.
  3. Did the Church gentile majority cause the switch from Sabbath to Sunday because of anti-Semitism?
  4. Should all Christians keep the seventh day rest as the Sabbath commandment just as Jesus did, or was it somehow abolished by His death on the cross?
  5. Does it matter which day is our Sabbath; or can Sunday be the "Christian Sabbath"?

 As a new Christian thirty years ago, I came upon this dilemma which seemed to conflict with the teachings of the Catholic and Protestant Church, the latter of which I'm a part.

I was told, as were many of you were, that Christians only worship (or rest…maybe) on the first day of the week. This is because Jesus rose from the dead on that day, and besides that, Saturday was the Jewish day of worship and rest, and Christian are not to act like Jews. This always sounded anti-Semitic and illogical to me, because Jesus was a Jew, and He never stopped being a Jew!). Some people even told me that the Ten Commandments were no longer binding, so a day of rest was completely optional. You can rest on any day that you want…God didn't care! Being a new Christian I put my questions aside because of more pressing issues.

Well, did Jesus, the twelve Apostles or a new prophet come along and cancel out the forth commandment, one of the Big Ten that God Himself gave? That would require the power and authority of God Himself. It would also require a palatable explanation of why God would revoke a commandment that He had declared to be eternal (Exodus 20). Isn't God immutable, nether changing or making mistakes?

Is Colossians 2:6 or Romans 14:5 the abrogating New Testament scriptures that open the door for Sunday morning worship time? Does the account of Paul's preaching in Acts 20:7 direct us to honor Sunday keeping instead of the Sabbath?

If you read carefully you can see that Paul really preached after sundown Saturday before he departed Sunday morning. Breaking bread after the Sabbath (sundown) was a common Jewish practice. Some Christians amazingly think that Paul spoke over 24 hours unto the morning then departed by ship Monday! Preaching all day and all night then leaving on a long journey would be a miracle! Most importantly, the narrative nowhere tells believers to meet and worship on Sunday, saying so reads into the story undocumented intent! That’s bad hermeneutics.

Reading Act 15:19-21 shows that the gentile members of the church had a different standard to observe than their Jewish counterparts. Nobody likes to admit this double tiered system existed but the situation called for sidestepping obstacles facing the new gentile converts. Remember in Jerusalem the Jewish believers under the Apostles and Elders zealously observed the Law (Acts 21:20)! Please take note that 20 years after the resurrection no one complained or corrected them for observing the LAW. Even the Apostle Paul showed that he was Torah observant (Acts 21:24, 28:17. As the Church became increasingly Gentile they may have felt this double standard was not equal enough so they universally imposed their lesser requirements upon the whole faith wrongly believing that this was God's will. Three reasons encouraging this action were the conflicts with Rome, the anti-Christian synagogue, and disagreements with fellow Jewish believers. From the second century on, anti-Semitism is openly expressed in the many writings of the Church fathers [see endnotes]. As we go along I will show the abundant facts of this embarrassing indictment.

I have found that the Bible refers to the Sabbath in three ways, a literal seventh day observance (Exodus 20), a spiritual rest (Hebrews 4:8-10) and the physical rest of the Promised Land for Israel (Deuteronomy 12:9,10). Unless you ignore many scripture references to the Sabbath it can't be singularly observed, abolished, transferred, or spiritualized away at the same time! Allegory is a useful interpretive device but it can make scripture say whatever you want it to. Most Sunday justification comes from this interpretive method. The early church fathers learned about this method from their Jewish contemporaries, but relied on it too much.

It is very obvious that the change from the seventh to the first day of the week is not based on a direct divine command, but was argued from biblical theology, analogy and finally historical example . But why does the Church argue against God's established Sabbath? What is the real reason for this "doctrine of man"? Remember there is no divine command! The doctrinal abolishment of the Sabbath is laden with error and this has been kept from many Christians!

In an effort to get to the bottom of these questions and defend against the unfair anti-Semitic label of "Judaizer", I have collected some scriptural and historical evidence concerning the early Church's position on Sabbath and/or Sunday observances. This is only a brief sketch of the subject.

To find the origins of the Sabbath we begin in the Book of Genesis.

Noah then waited another seven days and sent the dove out again…the dove did not return. Sevens play a significant and symbolic role in this narrative. Seven clean animals entered the ark. Seven days passed before the flood began and it was 14 days (7 x 2) until the waters were dried up upon the earth.

Catholic Sunday literature agrees that,

"The observance of the Sunday was at first supplemental to that of the Sabbath, but in proportion as the gulf between the Church and the Synagogue widened, the Sabbath became less and less important, and ended at length in being entirely neglected" (Duchesne, Christian Worship, 47).

Catholic scholars and priests are much more honest and straightforward in their reasons the Catholic Church adopted Sunday and canceled the Biblical Sabbath (although this was a gradual process, spanning 300 to 400 years). Protestant polemists waste their efforts quoting from post Apostolic (gentile) Fathers and their literature to justify 1900 years of disobedience. Most of these guys were shaky theologically at one time or another due to their Gnostic or semi-Gnostic beliefs. Their semi-heretical ideas do not qualify them as the best group to look to for doctrinal additions. The Catholic Church, which actually made the switch, admits that they simply switched because they believed they had the power to do so because Jesus bestowed authority upon Peter. Because there is no written authority or proof, they never waste time postulating that the apostles must have instituted the change. A few enlightening examples are given below.

Catholics

Martin J. Scott, Things Catholics Are Asked About (1927), p. 136.

"Nowhere in the Bible is it stated that worship should be changed from Saturday to Sunday.... Now the Church ... instituted, by God's authority, Sunday as the day of worship. This same Church, by the same divine authority, taught the doctrine of Purgatory long before the Bible was made. We have, therefore, the same authority for Purgatory as we have for Sunday."

Peter R. Kraemer, Catholic Church Extension Society (1975), Chicago, Illinois.

"Regarding the change from the observance of the Jewish Sabbath to the Christian Sunday, I wish to draw your attention to the facts: "1) That Protestants, who accept the Bible as the only rule of faith and religion, should by all means go back to the observance of the Sabbath. The fact that they do not, but on the contrary observe the Sunday, stultifies them in the eyes of every thinking man. "2) We Catholics do not accept the Bible as the only rule of faith. Besides the Bible we have the living Church, the authority of the Church, as a rule to guide us. We say, this Church, instituted by Christ to teach and guide man through life, has the right to change the ceremonial laws of the Old Testament and hence, we accept her change of the Sabbath to Sunday. We frankly say, yes, the Church made this change, made this law, as she made many other laws, for instance, the Friday abstinence, the unmarried priesthood, the laws concerning mixed marriages, the regulation of Catholic marriages and a thousand other laws. "It is always somewhat laughable, to see the Protestant churches, in pulpit and legislation, demand the observance of Sunday, of which there is nothing in their Bible."

John Laux, A Course in Religion for Catholic High Schools and Academies (1 936), vol. 1, P. 51.

"Some theologians have held that God likewise directly determined the Sunday as the day of worship in the New Law, that He Himself has explicitly substituted the Sunday for the Sabbath. But this theory is now entirely abandoned. It is now commonly held that God simply gave His Church the power to set aside whatever day or days she would deem suitable as Holy Days. The Church chose Sunday, the first day of the week, and in the course of time added other days as holy days."

Protestants

Lutheran, The Sunday Problem , a study book of the United Lutheran Church (1923), p. 36.

"We have seen how gradually the impression of the Jewish sabbath faded from the mind of the Christian Church, and how completely the newer thought underlying the observance of the first day took possession of the church. We have seen that the Christians of the first three centuries never confused one with the other, but for a time celebrated both."

Augsburg Confession of Faith art. 28; written by Melanchthon, approved by Martin Luther, 1530; as published in The Book of Concord of the Evangelical Lutheran Church Henry Jacobs, ed. (1 91 1), p. 63.

"They [Roman Catholics] refer to the Sabbath Day, as having been changed into the Lord's Day, contrary to the Decalogue, as it seems. Neither is there any example whereof they make more than concerning the changing of the Sabbath Day. Great, say they, is the power of the Church, since it has dispensed with one of the Ten Commandments!"

Dwight L. Moody, Weighed and Wanting (Fleming H. Revell Co.: New York), pp. 47, 48.

The Sabbath was binding in Eden, and it has been in force ever since. This fourth commandment begins with the word 'remember,' showing that the Sabbath already existed when God wrote the law on the tables of stone at Sinai. How can men claim that this one commandment has been done away with when they will admit that the other nine are still binding?"
Despite all this history and true confession, today many writers still argue with wishful logic and censored facts. Note that the statement below argues from the absence of facts and says nothing about Christian Sabbath observance.
The celebration of the Lord's Day in memory of the resurrection of Christ dates undoubtedly from the apostolic age. Nothing short of apostolic precedent can account for the universal religious observance in the churches of the second century. There is no dissenting voice. This custom is confirmed by the testimonies of the earliest post-apostolic writers, as Barnabas, Ignatius, and Justin Martyr. History Of The Christian Church, Philip Schaff, , vol. 1, pg. 201-202

The anti-popish Protestants ironically follow the unscriptural commands imposed by the Popish Church that they so pride themselves in opposing. (I'm not anti-Catholic I'm just saying this for satire.) This whole thing could be seen as buffoonery catalyzed by anti-Semitism and compromising pagan culture if it was not so obviously tragic in its consequences. The gentile church's blemished history of crimes against fellow Christians and especially Jews are a testimony to their long list of errors (tradition's equality with Scripture, purgatory/limbo, infant baptism, buying indulgences, celibacy, pilgrimages, monasticism, Mary, Saint and relic veneration or worship (depending on your view).

Ironically in 1998 the Pope in his Pastoral Letter, Dies Domini, challenges Christians to respect Sunday, not merely as an ecclesiastical institution, but as a divine command. The Pope places Sundaykeeping in the Sabbath commandment. The Pope even encourages Christians to "ensure that civil legislation respects their duty to keep Sunday holy."

  Many non-Jewish Christians did observe the Sabbath as seen from polemics written against this practice by the early church fathers that express their virulent anti-Jewish views.

Laws and events affecting the Sabbath :

* Period of no record (100-150 AD), events are obscure. Apostasy occurs during this time.

* From 60 AD to 135 AD was a period of intense anti-Jewish sentiment. Roman literature and law condemned Jews and especially their Sabbath keeping. Roman armies crushed Jerusalem and destroyed the Temple about 70 AD.

* Trajan (98-117) gave an extermination order to kill Christians and Christians moved into catacombs .

* The Romans crushed a second Jewish revolt led by Bar Kokeba. Emperor Hadrian (117-138 AD) outlawed Judaism and Sabbath keeping under punishment of death. Professing gentile Christians de-Judaized themselves, finding it very dangerous to observe the Sabbath and Jewish festivals.

* To avoid problems, Christians began to hold Sunday meetings immediately after midnight and this led to the belief that Christians were responsible for most of the problems that occurred at night. Christians refused to go to the games, chariot races, and gladiators.

* (161-180 AD) Marcus Aurelius people blamed the Christians and their lack of loyalty to the Roman gods as the cause of the famines and plagues of the period

* (193-211) Septimus Severus attacked the Christians throughout the empire as non-believers in the state religion

"Let all the judges and town people, and the occupation of all trades, rest on the venerable day of the sun". This was not for the sake of Christians but for the Sun god worshipers, of which Constantine was the state religious head. In the article "Sunday," The Encyclopaedia Britannica, seventh edition, 1842, says: "It was Constantine who first made a law of the proper observance of Sunday; and who, according to Eusebius, appointed that it should be regularly celebrated throughout the Roman Empire."

325 AD: Constantine convened the First Ecumenical Council in the city of Nicea . The Jewish Passover (14 th of Nisan) is changed to Easter Sunday. "Easter" was the name for the pagan goddess of the dawn celebrated during the spring equinox. In the second century, St. Polycarp, Bishop of Smyrna in Asia Minor journeyed to Rome to confer with Pope Anicetus regarding the disagreement over the proper date for the celebration of Pascha. Neither was able to convince the other, and they decided that the two practices could coexist. I included this example to show that other non-Biblical changes were linked to anti-Semitism and paganism

364 AD Council of Laodicea– the Roman Catholic Church, made laws forcing all Christians to work on the Sabbath or be anathema. This was fostered by the non-Jewish part of the church, which held deep-seated anti-Jewish views. "Christians must not Judaize by resting on the Sabbath, but must work on that day, rather honoring the Lord's Day, resting then as Christians. But if any shall be found to be Judaizing, let him be anathema from Christ" (as quoted in A History of the Church Councils, by Charles J. Hefele, Volume 11, p. 316).

431AD: The Third Ecumenical Council at Ephesus condemns the Nestorian heresy and approves the veneration of the Virgin Mary as Theotokos (God-Bearer or Mother of God). The Nestorians go into exile in the Persian Empire and become the Assyrian Orthodox Church of the East. This shows the progress of heretical ideas.

Q: Was the Sabbath only for the Jews? Mark 2:27 "the Sabbath was made for man …" - God’s intent was explained by Jesus. The Sabbath was not for the Jews only!

The LAW or the Torah (which means, instruction ) was made part of the "New Covenant" (Ezekiel 36:26) and not cast aside as taught by uninformed Christian teachers. This is an important part of the New Covenant.

God will: "…bring them to His Holy mountain," "…Make them joyful in His house of prayer." Accept their burnt offerings and sacrifices upon His altar.

Even at Sinai there was a mixed multitude of non-Israelites along with the twelve tribes of Israel [Exodus 12:38]. Together they accepted the covenant [circumcision] becoming part of the commonwealth of Israel. The eleventh chapter of Romans is not a new concept. It shows that gentiles have access to salvation through the covenant with Abraham (Genesis 22:17-18), which allows their graft into Israel, making them partakers of the New Covenant, which was promised to the houses of Israel and Jacob. Jeremiah 31:31. The salvation of the gentile does not replace redeemed Israel, but merely includes them. Likewise, Leviticus 15:15, says there is to be one LAW for both Jew and gentile and by the nature of the NC this LAW was written in the mind and heart of all the redeemed!

If the redeemed Jews, kept the Sabbath then it stands to reason that the redeemed gentiles did also, as the same LAW was written in their mind and heart.

The early church fathers are often quoted, as supporting Sunday worship and maligning Sabbath keepers as Judaizers. How valid are their extra-scriptural comments for positions of apostolic doctrine?

Ignatius of Antioch to Syria (ca. 20-107) has been credited with about fifteen epistles, and the one written to the Magnesians is supposed to indicate a Sunday Lord's Day. We quote from chapters VIII and IX:

"Be not deceived with strange doctrines, nor with old fables, which are unprofitable. For if we still live according to the Jewish law, we acknowledge that we have not received grace.
"... If, therefore, those who were brought up in the ancient order of things have come to the possession of a new hope, no longer observing Sabbath, but living in the observance of the Lord's Day, on which also our life has sprung up again by Him and by His death" (The Ante-Nicene Fathers, Wake's Translation, of Volume 1, p. 62, 1953 edition).
Facts relative to this quotation need to be considered: (1) The epistles of Ignatius are acknowledged by various writers to be spurious . (2 ) The epistle to the Magnesians would say nothing of a day, were it not that the word was fraudulently inserted . Dr. Killen speaks as follows concerning these epistles:
"In the sixteenth century, fifteen letters were brought out from beneath the mantle of a hoary antiquity, and offered to the world as the productions of the pastor of Antioch. Scholars refused to receive them on the terms required, and forthwith eight of them were admitted to be forgeries. In the seventeenth century, the seven remaining letters, in a somewhat altered form, again came forth from obscurity, and claimed to be the works of Ignatius. Again discerning critics refused to acknowledge their pretensions; but curiosity was aroused by this second apparition, and many expressed an earnest desire to obtain a light of the -real epistles" ( Ancient Church , Section 2, Chapter 3, pp. 413, 414 ). Excerpt from: "A history of the Sabbath and Sunday" Part 11 , SUNDAY HISTORY THROUGH THE AGES By John Kiesz
The Epistle of Barnabas (130 AD?), also referred to as Pseudo-Barnabas is sometimes referred to as evidence for the change to Sunday
"... Further, He says then, 'Your new moons and your Sabbaths I cannot endure.' Ye perceive how He speaks: 'Your present Sabbaths are not acceptable to me, but that is which I have made, [namely this] when, giving rest to all things, I shall make a beginning of the eighth day that is a beginning of another world.' Wherefore, also, we keep the eighth day with joyfulness, the day also on which Jesus rose again from the dead. And when He had manifested Himself, He ascended into the heavens" (The Ante-Nicene Fathers, Chapter XV, p. 147, 1953 edition).
The "eighth day" is another term for the first day of the week, Sunday. Eusebius, the earliest of the church historians, places this epistle in the catalogue of spurious writings which means that it is not an authentic apostolic view and should carry no authority weight. This pseudo-Epistle was not written by the Apostle Paul's companion Barnabas, but possibly by someone from Alexandria, Egypt.

Justin Martyr (A. D. 110 - ca. 165) was the foremost Roman apologist during the second century makes the first direct authentic reference to Sunday.

"But Sunday is -the day on which we all hold our common assembly, because it is the first day on which God, having wrought a change in the darkness and matter, made the world, and Jesus Christ our Saviour on the same day rose from the dead." (Clark's Ante-Nicene Library, Chapter LXVII, p. 185, 1953 edition).

From the city of Rome Justin tries to persuade gentile Christians to gather together on the Day of the Sun. Rome had fought its final bitter war against the Jews in 135 AD. It is against this back drop and the anti-Jewish decrees of angry emperor Hadrian that Justin argues against the Sabbath and Torah observance. His arguments attempt to separate Christianity from Judaism and make Christianity palatable to pagans of the Roman Empire. For this reason he focuses on the Day of the Sun. Sunday centered worship was much more palatable to pagan and ex-pagan because of their sun god religious backgrounds. Thus "Christ the Sun" appealed to both gentile Christians and pagans alike. Justin Martyr writings helped to encouraged Sunday worship, which continued to spread throughout the Empire because of political and social-legal reasons.

Quoting from spurious books and Anti-Semitic leaders with ties to pagan philosophy forcedly negates any authoritative anti-Sabbath arguments. I'm not saying they were wrong in everything they said. They Birkath-ha-Minin helped the Church survived in many ways! They were just wrong on this matter…and some others.

Listed below are various quotes used to justify "Sunday only" worship. Note that they express the same errors as above.

Almost all of the quotes of the Church fathers promote Sunday as a memorial to the resurrection of Jesus and attack Sabbath keeping as Jewish. They do not quote any Apostle in regard to not keeping the Sabbath.

Jesus had a different view than expressed above, and in the Gospels He reveals God’s intention for the Sabbath:

In Mark 7:6-9 Jesus up braided some of the errant scribes and Pharisees because they laid aside the commandment of God in order to hold to the tradition of men.

He answered and said to them, Well hath Isaiah prophesied concerning you hypocrites, as it is written, This people honoureth me with their lips, but their heart is far from me.

But in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.

For laying aside the commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men, as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things ye do.

And he said to them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.

The Church hypocritically has done the same thing by replacing the LORD's Sabbath with the tradition of Sunday, the Roman day of the sun god. Jesus said that their worship was in vain because their heart and teaching was contrary to Lord's established commandment. Do we worship on Sunday only to have it be in vain due to our disobedience? The New Testament words of Jesus say yes, unless of course God holds us to a much lower standard of obedience than our Jewish brother.

Clearly, Jesus is pro-Sabbath. He corrected the distortions and abuses taught by the establishment. He declared Himself to be the Lord of the Sabbath, but by doing so he did not abrogate or annul it. The late 3 rd century church & State exceeded their authority by changing God's fourth commandment. By supporting the decisions made by the early Church fathers that were tainted by anti-Semitism, we have validated their errors and have institutionalized the breaking of the fourth commandment by the Church.

Conclusion

We can conclude that there is no scripture directing us to worship on Sunday although it is certainly permissible. Likewise there is no scripture commanding us to ignore the seventh day Sabbath which was establish as eternal. It is a "sign" between God and His people. God established the Sabbath before Sinai. At Sinai the Sabbath was made the fourth commandment to be remembered and observed, " throughout your generations ". As part of the Law (Torah) the Sabbath was included in the New Covenant to be written in the mind and on the hearts of Israel -Jeremiah 31:31 & Ezekiel 36:26 and as such obligate all believers.

Historical evidence shows that for many centuries most believers observed both the Sabbath and Sunday worship, but not without persecution.

The Sabbath is for both the Jew and Gentile believer, because in Christ they are one with "one LAW", albeit with some reduced requirements. Paul states that non-Jews have been grafted into Israel to be partakers of the New Covenant. The nation of Israel is the scriptural model given by God for us to follow not the customs of the nations from which we have been called and saved. The middle partition has been removed so that we may join those from whom we had been estranged; that is the commonwealth of Israel (Ephesians 2:14).

There is a wealth of evidence preserved in the writings of the "gentile" Church fathers, showing their harsh anti-Semitic attitudes. This acknowledged hated with the heretical influence of Gnostic ideas were ironically coupled with honest religious concern that developed doctrine that departed from the customs and teachings of Jesus and His Apostles..

In the OT God refers to the Sabbath as " My Sabbaths ". Israel was chastised for profaning His Sabbath. For the gentile Church to view Sunday as the "Christian Sabbath" is to profane the day that the LORD has given for a "eternal sign" between Him as His people. The LORD makes a point in saying "My Sabbaths" not "your Sabbaths". In the Bible there is no precedent for God giving Israel, the Church or any individual the authority to change His commandments. For this reason no one can set his own personal day of rest, ignoring the day God has instituted.

The primary issue at stake is whether we obey God or man. Many of you will default to Church custom and social pressure and continue to break God's Sabbath, although with some guilt. Some of you, because of your desire for truth, will feel compelled to submit to God's Word and observe His Sabbath, even in spite of the suspicion and ridicule coming from unsympathetic Christians.

Which ever path you choose remember "…the eyes of the LORD run to and fro throughout the whole earth, to shew himself strong in the behalf of them whose heart is perfect toward him…" -2 Chronicles 16:9.

What is a perfect heart? Look in 1 Chronicles 29:19.

"And give unto Solomon my son a perfect heart, to keep thy commandments, thy testimonies, and thy statutes, and to do all these things , and to build the palace, for the which I have made provision."

A perfect heart is expressed through faith and obedience.

I hope you have the courage to search these things out for yourself and then do what is right.  

Endnotes:

7-day week :

Samuele Bacchiocchi’s book FROM SABBATH TO SUNDAY

Week-days: Does the plural form "sabbaths" ( sabbaton ) refer exclusively to the seventh-day Sabbath? The fact that the plural is used in the Scripture to designate not only the seventh day Sabbath but also the week as a whole (LXX Ps 23:1; 47:1; 93:1 Mark 16:2; Luke 24:1; Acts 20:7), suggests the possibility that the term may refer to week-days. The latter view harmonizes better with the sequence of the enumeration, which suggests yearly, monthly, and weekly festivities.

A similar sequence, though in a reverse order, is given by Paul in Galatians 4:10 where he opposes a strikingly similar teaching which included the observance of "days, and months, and seasons, and years." The fact that the Galatians list begins with "days" ( hemeras , plural) suggests the possibility that the "sabbaths" in Colossians may also refer to week-days in general rather than to the seventh-day Sabbath in particular.

* * * *

In regard to days, the Greek and Roman world had many such special days , and weeks for every month of the year. Saturday was considered an especially unlucky day by the Romans, as were certain days such as "the ides of March". The people of the ancient world were a superstitious lot whose lives were governed by omens, special days, and the many monthly Festivals to their gods and goddesses. The Romans marked unlucky days in their calendars with black chalk, and lucky ones with white chalk; hence Nortare diem lactea gemma or alba means to mark a day as a lucky one.

Ides: In the ancient Roman calendar the 15th day of March, May, July and October and the 13th day of all the other months. The day always fell eight days after the NONES.

Nones: In the ancient Roman calendar the ninth (Latin nonus ) day before IDES

It's not likely that Paul (who called himself " a Pharisee" , years after his conversion -Acts 23:6), was referring to Jewish days, months etc, but instead denounced the syncretistic practices of Hellenistic and ex-pagan coverts (Galatians 4:10 - Ye observe days, and months, and times, and years .) By calling himself a Pharisee, Paul was identifying with the strict observance of fellow Pharisees (Acts 25:8, 28:17,18). By his response to the accusation that he was teaching the Jews to forsake the "Law of Moses" (Acts 21:21, 24, 26) he prove that he was obedient to the LAW. Paul only taught a greater degree of freedom for non-Jewish converts as approve by the Jewish Jerusalem council Acts 15: 6-29. The later, dominate anti-Jewish Gentile Church interpreted their freedom as a universal Church doctrine to be unbiblically imposed on both Jew and gentile alike.

We should not jump to conclusions about Sunday, based on vague scriptural associations, but should consider the prejudices and histories that weigh heavily on many of our interpretations that might never have been in the minds of the NT writers!


Leviticus 19:30 - Ye shall keep my sabbaths , and reverence my sanctuary: I [am] the LORD.

Ezekiel 20:12 - Moreover also I gave them my sabbaths , to be a sign between me and them, that they might know that I [am] the LORD that sanctify them.

Ezekiel 22:8 - Thou hast despised mine holy things, and hast profaned my sabbaths .


Anti-Semitism: A hatred of Jews and all things Jewish.

Sadly these are only a few from many examples. 1900 years would make quite a long list!

Anti-Semitism of the Church Fathers

Origen (185-254 CE) echoed the growing hostility:

"On account of their unbelief and other insults which they heaped upon Jesus, the Jews will not only suffer more than others in the judgment which is believed to impend over the world, but have even already endured such sufferings. For what nation is in exile from their own metropolis, and from the place sacred to the worship of their fathers, save the Jews alone? And the calamities they have suffered because they were a most wicked nation, which although guilty of many other sins, yet has been punished so severely for none as for those that were committed against our Jesus. 

Justin Martyr along with Hippolytus (170-236 CE) was obsessed with the belief that the Jews were receiving and would continue to receive God's punishment for having murdered Jesus. Hippolytus writes:

"Now then, incline thine ear to me and hear my words, and give heed, thou Jew. Many a time does thou boast thyself, in that thou didst condemn Jesus of Nazareth to death, and didst give him vinegar and gall to drink; and thou dost vaunt thyself because of this. Come, therefore, and let us consider together whether perchance thou dost boast unrighteously, O, Israel, and whether thou small portion of vinegar and gall has not brought down this fearful threatening upon thee and whether this is not the cause of thy present condition involved in these myriad of troubles."

Hilary of Poitiers (AD 291-371) wrote: "Jews are a perverse people accursed by God forever."

Ambrose defended the burning of the Callinicum synagogue by asking "who cares if a synagogue - home of insanity and unbelief - is destroyed?"

Gregory of Nyssa (331-396 CE) demonizes the Jews:

"Slayers of the Lord, murderers of the prophets, adversaries of God, men who show contempt for the Law, foes of grace, enemies of their fathers' faith, advocates of the Devil, brood of vipers, slanderers, scoffers, men whose minds are in darkness, leaven of the Pharisees, assembly of demons, sinners, wicked men, stoners, and haters of righteousness."

St. Jerome (AD 347-407) describes the Jews as "... serpents, wearing the image of Judas, their psalms and prayers are the braying of donkeys."

Gregory of Hyssa (died AD 394), Bishop of Cappadocia: "the Jews are a brood of vipers, haters of goodness..."

Homilies of Chrysostom (344-407 CE) St. John the Golden Mouthed. He is considered to be among the most beloved and admired in Church history rails hated against the Jews. The reason for this is because many Christians in Antioch were meeting with Jews, visiting Jewish homes, and attending their synagogues.

"The Jews sacrifice their children to Satan.... they are worse than wild beasts. The synagogue is a brothel, a den of scoundrels, the temple of demons devoted to idolatrous cults, a criminal assembly of Jews, a place of meeting for the assassins of Christ, a house of ill fame, a dwelling of iniquity, a gulf and abyss of perdition."

"The Jews have fallen into a condition lower than the vilest animal. Debauchery and drunkenness have brought them to the level of the lusty goat and the pig. They know only one thing: to satisfy their stomachs, to get drunk, to kill, and beat each other up like stage villains and coachmen."

"The synagogue is a curse, obstinate in her error, she refuses to see or hear, she has deliberately perverted her judgment; she has extinguished with herself the light of the Holy Spirit."

Chrysostom says that God Hates the Jews :

"But it was men, says the Jew, who brought these misfortunes upon us, not God. On the contrary, it was in fact God who brought them about. If you attribute them to men, reflect again that even supposing men had dared, they could not have had the power to accomplish them, unless it had been God's will...Men would certainly not have made war unless God had permitted them...Is it not obvious that it was because God hated you and rejected you once for all?"

Chrysostom says he hates the Jews:

"I hate the Jews because they violate the Law. I hate the synagogue because it has the Law and the prophets. It is the duty of all Christians to hate the Jews."

The blindness to Christian anti-Semitism is all too apparent in the statement by the great theologian John Henry Cardinal Newman describing Chrysostom as: " bright, cheerful, gentle soul, a sensitive heart ...". In seminaries and schools Chrysostom is presented as a champion of the faith and his Homilies were used as model sermons. His message of hate would be passed down to succeeding generations of theologians.

Augustine , the great theologian, was also guilty of the Jewish hatred. In a sermon on Catechumens, he says:

"The Jews hold him, the Jews insult him, the Jews bind him, crown him with thorns, dishonor him with spitting, scourge him, overwhelm with revilings, hang him upon the tree, pierce him with a spear...The Jews killed him."

"But when the Jews killed Christ, though they knew it not, they prepared the supper for us."

Augustine got the story wrong, the Romans actually did the above!

Augustine also taught that although the Apostles continued to live a Jewish life, it was heinous to follow their example once the Church was established. If the Apostles weren't good examples to follow then who was?


Other Greek and Latin theologians, historians and writers who thought and wrote of the Jews the same as Chrysostom are: Epiphanius, Diodorus of Tarsus, Theodore of Mopsuestia, Theodoret of Cyprus, Cosmas Indicopleustes, Athanasius the Sinaite, Synesius and Hilarius of Poitiers, Prudentius, Paulas Orosius, Sulpicius Severus, Gennadius, Venantius Fortunatus, Isidore of Seville.


Forbidding Christians to observe the lunar Passover.

Excerpt from: ANTI-MESSIANIC JUDAISM: A BRIEF SUMMARY by Dan Juster

"After the destruction of Jerusalem and the scattering of the Jewish people, Church fathers took a decidedly negative stance toward the Jewish people. As part of this stand, they began to reject the propriety of Jewish life in the New Covenant. As Justin Martyr stated, keeping the Torah did not mean that the Jewish believer was lost, but it was not right. (In his Dialogue with Trypho the Jew, quoted in James Parkes' The Conflict of the Church and the Synagogue and Hugh Schoenfeld, A History of Jewish Christianity). Can we begin to see how amazing it is that the Church fathers who were not born Jewish were rejecting the life pattern of the Jewish Apostles as illegitimate? Toward the end of the second century, Pope Victor of Rome, in intense written debate with Polycrates, Bishop of Antioch forbade the use of the Jewish lunar calendar for dating Christian holy days. Polycrates was incredulous. How could he forbid the practices that were directly passed down by the Apostles? This was the first Church stance which forbade Jewish practice in the Church under penalty of exclusion from the Church . The issue of setting dates according to the Jewish lunar calendar was one of several issues leading to the split of the western and eastern Churches centuries later."

 Links

http://www.saltshakers.com/myson/ch8.htm So you're a Gentile Christian and you wonder why Jewish people have a…